ISSUE #41: Truth behind the Bucha massacre in Ukraine.
Don't take anything you see/hear in the Western media for granted.
On April 4, the Ukrain officials alleged Russia for the mass killings that took place in Bucha, which is a town outside Kyiv.
During his tour to Bucha, President Zelensky said, “ these are war crimes and will be recognized by the world as genocide.” Sure, killing civilians is a crime and the killings have really taken place, but is it really done by Russia?
When you ask Russia, they simply deny it and its envoy to the United Nations - Vasily Nebenzya - said Russia will present “ empirical evidence” to the Security Council on Tuesday against allegations.
What else, we have video evidence of Bucha’s mayor - Anatoliy Fedoruk - saying, on March 31st, that the Russian troops have left the town. Then the question arises, how can they kill civilians on April 4 when they had already left the place 4 days ago?
Did you hear it? Not even a single mention of “atrocities” by Russian troops on March 31st. It makes anyone - even with a little common sense - feel skeptical.
If it weren’t the Russians, who was it?
The New York Times reported on April 2 that the Azov battalion - which is a far-right extremist group integrated into the Ukrainian military - has entered the town of Bucha after Russian troops withdrew.
( Here’s a link to the NYT article ).
On April 3, Ukraine’s Defence Ministry shared footage of “Russian” atrocities. However, the NYT, in one of their articles, say they were, “unable to independently verify the assertions by Ukraine’s Defense Ministry and other officials.”
Now that we have a shred of strong evidence that the Russian troops didn’t do it, let's talk about what might happen next.
After the incident, Zelensky said the massacre of civilians has made it harder for Ukraine to proceed with peace talking with Russia.
America’s President Joe Biden said, “Well, the truth of the matter, you saw what happened in Bucha. He is a war criminal.” Biden added, “We have to continue to provide Ukraine with the weapons they need in order to fight.”
This happened at a time when peace talks started taking place between both countries and Russia was taking its troops back. Do you - like me - start to feel that they are using the Bucha massacre as a pretext for escalating NATO’s war against Russia? It is a real possibility that NATO doesn’t want this war to end. Why do I think so?
Because we have years of evidence of western media spreading propaganda like this to elicit the public’s emotions to justify the brutal invasion of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and many other countries where the West has caused WWII-like destruction.
At the end of the day, “Cui bono?” or “Who benefits?”
Russia? Not much. Had Russia really done this, there would be a global backlash against Russia - which doesn’t sound any beneficial to me.
America? A lot. I want you to recall Biden’s words about Putin last month. “This man (Putin) cannot remain in power,” said Biden during his speech at the Royal Castel in Warsaw, Poland. This is America’s policy towards Russia in one sentence. They desperately want regime change in a nuclear-power nation and the Bucha massacre is the perfect pretext to justify their ever-increasing aggressiveness towards Russia.
My work is entirely reader-supported. If you find any value in this article, you can feel free to SUBSCRIBE to my newsletter and become a member of the community that seeks truth, nothing less.
What you say makes perfect sense to me. If the MSM is majorly promoting something, then I usually smell a "propagenda" rat; (agenda prop).